The Battle for Bronze: Who is the 3rd Best Footballer After Messi and Ronaldo

07 June 2025
Everyone knows Messi and Ronaldo are #1 and #2. But who is the third best player of their generation? We break down the top contenders like Neymar, Iniesta, Zlatan, and Modrić to settle the ultimate debate.
The Battle for Bronze: Who is the 3rd Best Footballer After Messi and Ronaldo?
The Unwinnable Argument... And The Real Debate
For fifteen years, the world of football has been stuck in one debate. Messi or Ronaldo? Ronaldo or Messi? It's the question that has started a million arguments and ended a million friendships. They are the two gods who sit on top of Mount Olympus, throwing lightning bolts at each other. They're number one and number two, in whichever order you want.
But let's be real. That debate is tired. The more interesting question, the one that has so many possible answers, is this: Who is number three? Who gets the bronze medal for this golden generation of football? Who was the best of the rest? The most 'copitatnt' footballer after the two aliens?
This is where things get spicy. There is no easy answer. The player you pick says a lot about what you love about football. Do you love pure, dazzling talent? Do you love quiet, intelligent genius? Or do you love a loud, charismatic icon? Let's dive into the main contenders and make the case for each one.
First, Let's Be Clear: The Gap to The Top Two is HUGE
Before we start, we have to put some respect on the names of Messi and Ronaldo. The reason we are even having a debate about 3rd place is because they created a level of their own. Their numbers, their consistency, and their trophy cabinets are just ridiculous. They have more Ballon d'Or awards between them than any other player has hot dinners.
They pushed each other to heights we never thought was possible. So, when we talk about who is 3rd, we are not saying they are close to Messi or Ronaldo. We are saying they are at the top of the next mountain over. Now, with that out of the way, let's look at the contenders.
Contender 1: Neymar Jr. - The Prince Who Was Promised
The Case For Neymar:
For a long time, Neymar was seen as the heir to the throne. The next in line. And if you watch his highlight reel, you can see why. In terms of pure, natural, jaw-dropping talent, Neymar might be the closest thing to Messi we've ever seen. The tricks, the flicks, the samba flair... it was pure magic.
At Barcelona, he formed the deadliest attacking trio in history with Messi and Suarez, the 'MSN'. They won the Champions League, and Neymar was a massive part of it. He wasn't just a sidekick; he was a star in his own right, scoring in the final. For Brazil, he has been their icon for a decade, carrying the hopes of a nation on his back. When he was at his best, he was simply unplayable. A true genius of a footballer.
The Case Against Neymar:
The story of Neymar is also a story of 'what if?'. His big-money move to PSG was supposed to make him the main man, but it didn't quite work out. While he won lots of trophies in France, he was often plagued by injuries at the most important times. He never won the Ballon d'Or, and he never led his team to that final Champions League glory as the undisputed number one. His career feels like it had another level that he never quite reached, which leaves him as a frustrating genius for some.
Contender 2: Andrés Iniesta - The Silent Puppet Master
The Case For Iniesta:
If Neymar is flashy, Iniesta is the exact opposite. He was the brain in the machine. He didn't have blistering pace or 20 step-overs, but he had something more valuable: a footballing brain that saw the game in the future. His control, his balance, his ability to glide past players with a simple turn was a work of art. He was the heart of the greatest club team ever (Pep's Barcelona) and the greatest national team ever (Spain's 2008-2012 winners).
And he scored maybe the most important goal of the 21st century: the winner in the 2010 World Cup final. You don't get much more clutch than that. People argue he should have won the Ballon d'Or in 2010. For pure footballing intelligence and influence, he's almost unmatched.
The Case Against Iniesta:
His greatness was quiet. If you only look at stats—goals and assists—Iniesta's numbers don't blow you away like a forward's would. His magic was in the pass before the assist, or the turn that created all the space. If you don't appreciate the subtle art of midfield play, you might miss just how incredible he was.
Contender 3: Zlatan Ibrahimović - The Lion King
The Case For Zlatan:
Zlatan is more than a footballer; he's an icon. A character. His career is defined by two things: unbelievable longevity and jaw-dropping arrogance (backed up by talent). The man scored league titles in the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, and France. He scored goals in four different decades. He scored some of the most ridiculous, acrobatic, impossible goals you will ever see. That bicycle kick against England? Come on.
He was the main man at nearly every club he went to. He dragged teams to success through sheer force of will and personality. There has never been a player like him and there never will be again. His highlight reel is a movie, and he is always the star.
The Case Against Zlatan:
The big one. The one thing missing from his giant trophy cabinet is the Champions League. It's the one prize that escaped him. For a player who calls himself a God, not winning the biggest prize in club football is a major hole in his resume. You could argue he never truly dominated at the absolute highest, most elite level, in the way the other contenders did.
Contender 4: Luka Modrić - The Man Who Broke The Throne
The Case For Modrić:
Luka Modrić has a unique claim to fame: he's the only man who broke the Messi-Ronaldo Ballon d'Or duopoly. In 2018, he won it. That alone puts him in a special category. He was the midfield engine of the Real Madrid team that won four Champions Leagues in five years. He was the quiet controller, the tireless worker with an artist's touch. That outside-of-the-boot pass is a thing of beauty.
He also led his tiny country of Croatia to a World Cup final, which is one of the greatest international football achievements ever. He is a winner, a leader, and a master of his craft. He has the trophies and the individual award to back up his claim.
The Case Against Modrić:
Like Iniesta, his greatness is not always measured in goals. He was part of a legendary team, and some might argue that Ronaldo was the main reason for their success. He doesn't have the huge global brand of a Neymar or a Zlatan. He is a footballer's footballer, respected by everyone in the game, but maybe not as famous to the casual fan.
Conclusion: So, Who's The Winner?
After all that, we still don't have one clear winner. And that's the beauty of this debate. The '3rd best player' is in the eye of the beholder.
- If you love raw, explosive talent and the feeling of 'what could have been', your answer is Neymar.
- If you love intelligence, teamwork, and the art of controlling a game, your answer is Iniesta.
- If you love personality, incredible goals, and a legendary character, your answer is Zlatan.
- If you love a hard-working, trophy-winning leader who reached the pinnacle, your answer is Modrić.
There is no right answer. All of these players were giants of the game who were unlucky to be playing in the same era as two aliens. They all deserve to be remembered as legends. The real winner is us, the fans, who got to watch all of their incredible stories unfold.